imageI am a salafi revert and I have been targeted for harassment by individuals from the Muslim and non Muslim community including individuals from the salafi community here in Luton UK, which I believe is for the intention of putting me under duress and control for the purpose of radicalisation and terrorism.
I am currently on a Prevent referral.
I believe there may be people ascribing to salafiyah and Islam in general in the UK Muslim community who hold an unclear mixed and unstable ideology which is at variance with Sunni Islam not to mention salafiyah, and who may be Shia orientated and that these people may be being utilised by counter terrorism policing and government intelligence and security services as human intelligence assets and in turn due to their ideologically opposed beliefs, may be utilising and abusing counter extremism and anti terror legislation and privileged intelligence and information to harass, oppress and commit other offences including modern slavery, forced marriage and domestic abuse and other interferences, and even to radicalise into terrorist acts, vulnerable Sunni Muslims, even while they outwardly appear to call to and promote salafiyah or other groups, understandings, or sects of Islam.
Muslims, please beware.

I would like to warn the Muslims to be wary of marriage in these times when there are people with unclear, unstable and mixed ideologies within the Sunni ‘Muslim’ community and who have emnity towards Islam and are supported by certain authorities in the wider community.
By Allah I nearly married a tramp whose brother I now know was in the MOD at the time while pretending to work in an another job as an everyday Muslim brother and who I now suspect was and still is working for intelligence/security services.
I was at the time an attendee of Luton Islamic Centre where another former attendee, Abdul Wahab al Abdaly, was involved in the Stockholm 2010 bombing- I believe he was radicalised under duress in the same manner that was attempted with myself, covert harassment, and ended up married to who I believe may have been an agent who may have been used to control and manage him prior to the bombing.
Incidentally pipe bombs were used in the Stockholm attack, the same device which the MOD boyo who attempted to marry me to his sister suggested to me to make back around the time he had befriended me.
Bedfordshire police Eastern Region Special Operations Unit (ERSOU) have been made aware of all of this and I am currently a self referral to PREVENT which I believe ERSOU along with Luton Borough Council have consistently mishandled and which I believe may have been stymied in an attempt to protect state intelligence assets and illegal and unethical operations within Luton’s Muslim and wider community.
I wish to raise awareness about this situation which I believe is affecting innocent Muslims and others.
Be wary of these people Muslims, by Allah they are shayateen.

I am currently in a legal process which is related to religiously motivated harassment, sectarianism, radicalisation for the purpose of terrorism, modern slavery and forced marriage, please could anyone affected by any of these issues or any kind of harassment please get in touch as I am hoping to strengthen my case with corroborating accounts as well as to form a platform for justice and redress and to mutually support and help each other.
Thank you in advance.
John Hutton

Say no and stand up to harassment, radicalisation, government abuses and modern slavery

What is the hidden evil?

As a lutonian convert to Islam I have been subjected to harassment since 2016 that I believe has been intended to put me under duress for, amongst other things, the purpose of radicalisation and ultimately terrorism.
I believe that, due to the breadth and nature of the harassment as well as the subsequent and consistent failings and mishandling by the police and their multi-agency partners in CONTEST/PREVENT, the harassment and also the grooming that I believe took place prior to it that involved members of the Muslim and wider community, could only be facilitated with abuses of both RIPA laws and counter extremism legislation and with the collaboration of elements within state departments including counter terrorism policing and their partners in intelligence and security, but also with the recruitment of other state services and organisations via the ever increasing outsourcing of powers and data sharing that is the model for the government’s CONTEST/PREVENT program.
I also believe that this situation is being enabled by the actions of intelligence/security assets within the Muslim and wider community who may be abusing privileged information and powers to engage in harassment, hostile/‘overt surveillance’ and other interferences with Sunni Muslims and others and which is being sanctioned by multi-agency CONTEST/PREVENT stakeholders, with little or no accountability.
I also believe that this type of covert harassment and grooming may also be a factor in incidents of modern slavery and forced marriage both within the Muslim community and the wider community.

It is these failings and the realisation that state services are failing many more people like myself that has motivated me to seek to establish some unity between those of us affected by it.

My aims are as follows:

* To raise awareness of harassment, radicalisation, modern slavery and forced marriage affecting the Muslim and wider community.

* To support Muslims and others who are being targeted for harassment.
* To establish a forum and support system for people who are being let down by state services.

* To establish a platform for legal redress and justice.

If you are affected by any of these issues please contact me at

j.hutton1398@outlook.com

07710 987880

facebook/John Hutton

The questions regarding Radicalisation that the Home Secretary and Bedfordshire Police have declined to answer

Below is a list of questions I put to the Home Secretary and the Chief Constable of Bedfordshire Police in a correspondence regarding what I believe to be irregularities and endemic failures in anti radicalisation policy and a totalitarian lack of transparency and redress to abuses of RIPA laws which may be contributing to a … Continue reading “The questions regarding Radicalisation that the Home Secretary and Bedfordshire Police have declined to answer”

Below is a list of questions I put to the Home Secretary and the Chief Constable of Bedfordshire Police in a correspondence regarding what I believe to be irregularities and endemic failures in anti radicalisation policy and a totalitarian lack of transparency and redress to abuses of RIPA laws which may be contributing to a situation where people are being put under duress through harassment and intimidation in their daily lives.

This situation is a serious threat to everyone’s human rights and freedom, that authorised persons within Government agencies, Local Government Authorities and other organisations can in practice subject individuals to harassment and intimidation by misusing laws designed to protect us from terrorism and criminality to stifle dissent, silence whistleblowers, to ‘manage performance’ or for other illegal aims and agendas.

I am one of these individuals who have been subject to harassment by these laws which are purportedly designed to allow ftror covert surveillance for the purposes of gathering intelligence or evidence for the purpose of crime prevention, these laws do not, in letter at least, permit harassment and intimidation of individuals for the purpose of putting that individual under duress in some quasi-legal shadow world where there is practically no form of redress or examination, which from my experience, in practice appears to be exactly what is taking place.

The questions I have put to the Home Secretary and Bedfordshire Police, which so far they have been unable to answer are regarding the supervision of these laws, or rather the lack thereof, and how they relate to the radicalisation of individuals, possibly under duress, as well as the continued failure to identify that individuals may be being radicalised/recruited covertly under duress by others who appear to be consistently evading detection and the lack of a cohesive strategy for combating it.

 

They are as follows;

 

1. I believe I have been targeted for harassment with the aim of putting me under duress, which I believe is religiously/politically motivated. I am a former attendee of a mosque where at least two other former attendees have been involved in terrorist acts, I have complained to the Chief Constable of Bedfordshire Police and the Home Secretary as well as the Government supported TellMama organisation, whose mission is to provide support to victims of anti-Muslim hate, but to no avail-is this acceptable?

2. These former attendees had seemingly no prior indication of involvement in extremism nor as far as I know have any associates of theirs been charged with any offences relating to the commission of their crimes or been able to provide any information as to who radicalised these men and how, but they have ended up involved in terror attacks. Also, at least one of these men, Khalid Masood had been under surveillance for some period before being considered not a threat, therefore it is fair to say that these men may have been covertly radicalised/recruited, has it been identified by the Home Office/Police that it is possible that this has taken place under duress?

3. Has it been identified by the Home Office/Police that these men as well as other similar individuals involved in UK terror attacks such as Nicky Reilly, the man involved in the 2008 Exeter bombing (who had profound learning difficulties and who was radicalised by unknown persons, which has been assumed took place online, although no trace of these individuals has been found despite the increased surveillance powers available) had similar profile traits in they were not from the largely homogenous and predominantly South Asian community and in this respect were more socially vulnerable and more susceptible to radicalisation, possibly under duress? If so, what measures have been taken to combat the radicalisation of more socially vulnerable individuals and are how are these measures robust enough to deal with radicalisation through covert methods?

4. I was working for a Local Government Authority at the time of the commencement of the harassment, where I believe I was subjected to acts of intimidation, bullying and harassment both in the workplace and outside of work. Having read in the media an article https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/bullying_and_harassment_23#comment-4081 of a (edit) former employee of Luton Borough Council whose account mirrors my own experience where they have claimed that they had in their time in the workplace experienced harassment and bullying and that they continued to do so after leaving the job and where they stated that they believed RIPA laws are being abused to harass others, I would like to ask what provisions exist to ensure that authorised persons working for Local Goverment and other organisations are not abusing these powers, and that ‘rogue operators’ are not utilising these powers for non prescribed purposes/agendas and what recourse is available to individuals who believe they are being harassed and bullied by such persons utilising these laws to intimidate using Mobbing style tactics when the laws themselves are designed to allow actions to take place covertly and therefore afford a level of deniability and concealment to those involved?

5. Also, has it been identified by the Home Office/Police that abuses of these laws in such a manner whereby there is provision to co-opt council workers, police officers, National Health staff, neighbours, work colleagues, postal workers etc., effectively anyone a targeted person may come into contact with in his/her day to day life would be likely to cause serious mental and possibly physical harm to the individual and put them under extreme duress especially when ‘surveillance’ is conducted in a hostile and belligerent manner and has the Home Office/Police identified that the malicious abuse of these laws in this way may be being used to marginalise, discredit and to institutionalise victims into the mental health system, either by causing genuine mental harm to them or because by them making a complaint about such a situation, where apparently multiple unrelated individuals have had a threatening and malicious attitude towards them, they can can be deemed as having symptoms consistent with mental health issues? If so, what recourse is provided for an individual in this situation?

6. When I reported that I believe I was being harassed for religious/political reasons to both Bedfordshire Police and TellMama, (who failed to get back in touch me despite repeated reminders) in March 2017, I subsequently received a phone call from my GP Surgery requesting I make an appointment for an adult safeguarding issue which I have been reliably informed may involve an evaluation of my mental health. Is it official Government policy to refer Muslims who report claims of harassment and targeting to psychiatric evaluation and if so, how would this approach prevent an individual from being radicalised under duress?

7. During the first year of the the harassment, which was a particularly difficult time for me, I was considering a move to Saudi Arabia, hoping to get away from the incessant harassment and was applying for jobs and researching the requirements for acceptance into the country as a foreign worker. I noticed that a Police clearance/Good conduct certificate from a British Police Force is required by Saudi authorities for UK passport holders and I would like to know how Khalid Masood, the man involved in the 2017 Westminster attack managed to acquire this Police clearance in light of his violent and recent criminal record when he went to Saudi Arabia in 2005 and 2008?

8. In light of recent and ongoing Sunni/Shia conflicts in the Middle East, particularly in Iraq and Syria, has the possibility of sectarian agitators and agent provocateurs been a focus of investigation into radicalisation?

9. In view of the rising phenomenon of Mobbing tactics being used to target and bully individuals, particularly in the workplace, (concurrent with the increased surveillance laws) which are broadly defined as ‘bullying of an individual by a group, in any context, such as family, peer group, school, workplace, neighbourhood, community or online’, why is there no Home Office/Police acknowledgement of this behaviour being employed on a wider community level or strategy to combat it, while schemes such as Cocoon Watch, brought in by the Home Office for victims of crimes such as domestic abuse where people at risk are supported by the Police and provided with panic buttons or mobile phones to be able to contact police have proved highly successful?

The Home Secretary’s Office has declined these questions stating that ‘it would not be appropriate for Ministers or officials to comment on, or intervene in, a specific case, investigation or complaint’.

These questions though framed by my complaint of harassment, which I believe misuse of these laws have been a contributing factor in, relate to policy, which the Home Office is ultimately responsible for.

Bedfordshire Police Chief Constables Office have declined to answer, referring my complaint to the Police’s Professional Standards Department.

 

Update; Following this publication and just hours prior to my complaint to the IOPC, Bedfordshire Police announced that Chief Constable Boutcher was to stand down as Chief Constable.